top of page
SBR Services (8).jpg

Engineering Firms

Engineering firms often wrestle with utilization, project profitability,
WIP/backlog health, and heavy principal involvement in technical oversight.
We help you increase leverage, not just hours billed.

Engineering Client:
From Principal Firefighting to Leverage

  • A 40-person civil and transportation engineering firm at $9.2M in revenue had strong demand but principals billing 85–90% of their time and limited visibility into discipline-level margins.

  • ​Over 24 months, the firm reset utilization targets, improved WIP and backlog reporting, and shifted principal time into mentoring and firm-building.

  • ​Discipline-level gross margins improved by 4–5 points and the firm built a credible second line of leaders for future succession.

Utilization, WIP & Margin Upgrades

Align billable/non-billable time, discipline mix, and pricing so utilization and job-level gross margins improve instead of eroding under pressure.
 

  • Clarify utilization targets by level and discipline.

  • Strengthen change-order and scope management for engineering projects.

  • Improve WIP/backlog quality and visibility for leaders.

Leverage Senior Technical Talent

Move senior engineers and principals from constant firefighting into mentoring, QA/peer review, and firm-building work that scales across disciplines.

​

  • Redesign roles so principal-engineers are not the only problem solvers.

  • Introduce peer review and QA structures that do not bottleneck around one person.

  • Build time for BD, key clients, and strategy into senior workloads.

De-Risk Key-Person Dependency

Reduce dependence on a handful of senior engineers and rainmakers so clients and staff trust the broader organization, not just individuals.

​

  • Map key-person risks across disciplines, geographies, and client relationships.

  • Develop a next-generation leadership bench with clear accountabilities.

  • Prepare the firm for succession, PE investment, or strategic sale.

For engineers, this work often centers on utilizations, leveraging senior technical talent and de-risking key person dependency, so the business is more stable and productive.

istockphoto-1352825038-612x612.jpg

Case Study

Regional Transportation Firm Reducing Principal Dependency

  • Starting situation (Year 0):

    • $9.2M revenue, ~40 FTEs across 3 offices.

    • Principals billing 85–90% of their time, heavily involved in technical review and client escalations.

    • Utilization targets inconsistent by level; discipline-level gross margins between 42–45%, below industry benchmarks.

    • Backlog-to-revenue ratio around 1.0x with limited insight into margin by project type.

  • Key constraints:

    • Scarce mid-level leadership; senior PMs lacked authority to make trade-offs.

    • WIP and backlog reporting siloed in spreadsheets; leaders could not see risk early.

    • No shared definition of a “good” project mix across transportation vs. site/civil.

  • Timeline (24 months):

    • Months 1–4: Baseline Value assessment and metrics (utilization by level, discipline gross margin, backlog mix and aging).

    • Months 5–12: Redesigned utilization targets and role expectations; introduced a monthly WIP/backlog review cadence.

    • Months 13–24: Developed discipline leads, tightened project selection and pricing, clarified who owns which decisions by office and discipline.

  • Before/after metrics:

    • Discipline gross margin: from 42–45% to 48–50%.

    • Principal billable time: from 85–90% down to 55–60%.

    • Backlog-to-revenue ratio: from 1.0x to 1.3x with better-qualified work and clearer visibility.

    • Discipline leaders with clear accountability: from 0 to 3.

  • Result: The firm became less dependent on a handful of principals, with a stronger earnings profile and leadership bench for internal succession or future PE interest.

bottom of page