top of page
SBR Services (6).jpg

Architecture Firms

Architecture firms often balance creative excellence with
uneven operations, thin margins, and owner-led decision-making.
We help you protect design quality while building a more disciplined, valuable practice.

Architecture Client:
Design Reputation to Transferable Practice

  • A 25-person institutional architecture firm with $4.8M in revenue had strong design reputation but uneven margins and a principal still reviewing every major decision.

  • ​Over 18 months, the firm clarified studio leadership roles, tightened fee discipline, and installed a simple project review rhythm so decisions and client issues no longer bottlenecked at the top.

  • ​Net profit margin improved from roughly 8% to 14% and the firm developed two studio leaders positioned for future ownership.

From Heroic PMs to Healthy Studios

Reduce dependence on a few “hero” project managers and principals by clarifying roles, authority, and decision rights across studios.

Profitable Design,
Not Just Great Design

Improve fee discipline, scope control, and utilization so award-winning projects also deliver strong margins and cash flow.

Transferable Practice, Not Just a Name

Grow a leadership bench and systems that allow the firm’s reputation to outlast any one principal and support future succession or sale.

For architects, this work often centers on clarifying studio structures, improving project reviews,
and making sure your best designers stay focused on design instead of firefighting.

istockphoto-1405399303-612x612.jpg

Case Study

Institutional Architecture Firm Preparing for Internal Transition

  • Starting situation (Year 0):

    • $4.8M annual revenue, ~25 FTEs.

    • Net profit margin fluctuating between 6–8%.

    • Two founding partners billing ~70% of their time and personally overseeing most major projects.

    • Backlog-to-revenue ratio at 0.8x, with uneven visibility beyond 6–9 months.

  • Key constraints:

    • Thin studio leadership bench; senior designers lacked clear authority.

    • Inconsistent fee discipline and scope control leading to write-downs.

    • No documented path for internal buy-in or equity transition.

  • Timeline (18 months):

    • Months 1–3: Baseline Value Builder Score; mapped utilization, backlog, and principal time; clarified 3 priority studios.

    • Months 4–9: Defined studio lead roles, authority, and project review cadence; implemented basic go/no-go and fee checklist.

    • Months 10–18: Introduced leadership development for two studio leads, created 3-year internal transition framework and communication plan.

  • Before/after metrics:

    • Net profit margin: from 7% to 14%.

    • Backlog-to-revenue ratio: from 0.8x to 1.2x.

    • Founders’ billable time: from 70% down to 40%, with more time on BD, strategy, and mentoring.

    • Studio leads with defined P&L responsibility: from 0 to 2.

  • Result paragraph:
    Result: Valuation discussions moved from a single “what is it worth?” number to a structured internal transition plan, with a more transferable practice and lower key-person risk.

bottom of page